This page has been archived on the Web.
Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Office of the Chief Audit Executive
Table of Contents
1.0 Assurance Statement
The Office of the Chief Audit Executive (OCAE) of the Canada School of Public Service (the Canada School) has completed the Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. The objective of the audit was to provide assurance of the existence and effectiveness of the internal control activities over financial reporting. The audit approach and methodology followed the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing as defined by the Institute of Internal Auditors and the Internal Auditing Standards for the Government of Canada as required under the Treasury Board's Policy on Internal Audit.
For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009 (the period under audit), the OCAE concludes with a high level of assurance that, with a few exceptions, internal control activities over financial reporting at the entity level and for the five business processes (revenues, payroll expenditures, other operating expenditures, capital assets, and financial closing and reporting) existed and were generally operating effectively. Where they were not, deficiencies were related primarily to a lack of documentation, a lack of review and approval, and inadequate segregation of duties.
The Canada School should be ready to sustain an efficient controls-reliant audit of its financial statements by an external auditor if the organization:
- implements an action plan to remedy the exceptions noted above;
- audits the design and effectiveness of the internal control activities surrounding the transfer to the financial accounting system's new SAP platform (in operation since April 1, 2009); and
- audits the internal control activities over the compensation and benefits services operations (transferred to the Canada School in June 2009).
In the professional judgment of the Chief Audit Executive, sufficient and appropriate audit procedures have been conducted and evidence has been gathered to support the accuracy of the opinion provided in this report. This opinion is based on a comparison of the conditions at the time of the audit against pre-established audit criteria. The opinion is only applicable to the entity examined and for the scope and time period covered by the audit.
Elaine Maheu, CA
Chief Audit Executive
2.0 Executive Summary
2.1 Background and Audit Objective
The Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting is an assurance engagement that was part of the approved Canada School of Public Service Multi-year Risk-Based Audit Plan 2008-2009 to 2010-2011. The OCAE of the Canada School conducted the audit engagement.
The objective of the audit was to provide assurance that internal control activities over financial reporting existed, and that they were operating effectively as intended.
In 2007, the Canada School's management elected to undergo a Financial Statements Audit Readiness Assessment. This decision went beyond the government's expectations of an organization the size of the Canada School. The two main goals of this assessment were to strengthen the Canada School's internal control over financial reporting and position the organization to undergo a controls-reliant audit of its financial statements by an external auditor. An external consulting firm carried out the initial phases of the Audit Readiness Assessment, which included the following activities:
- review of the Canada School's financial statements and elements supporting the financial statements to ensure compliance with accounting policies and standards (Phase 1);
- documentation and assessment of the design effectiveness of the internal controls over financial closing and reporting, the business processes' controls over the revenues, payroll expenditures and other operating expenditures, capital assets, General Computer Controls (GCC) and entity-level controls (Phase 2); and
- audit of the Canada School's Statement of Financial Position as of March 31, 2008 (Phase 3).
After each phase, the consulting firm issued management reports, discussion papers and letters of recommendations. The letters of recommendations to the Canada School specifically addressed the control gaps. More specifically, after the documentation and assessment of the design effectiveness of the internal controls phase the consulting firm reported that once the Canada School implements a remediation/action plan and ensures the operating effectiveness of all key control activities, the organization would be ready to sustain an efficient external audit of its financial statements. Also, an unqualified audit opinion on the Canada School's Statement of financial position as at March 31, 2008 has been rendered by the audit firm in charge of the audit. In response, the Canada School's management prepared remediation/action plans indicating how and when the recommendations would be addressed. The Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting is, in fact, another phase and a continuation of the Audit Readiness Assessment the Canada School management decided to embark on in 2007.
2.2 Overall Conclusion and Findings
Phase 2 of the Audit Readiness Assessment found some weaknesses in the design of the internal control activities examined. The audit found that, during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009, the Canada School made good progress in implementing the action plan that was developed to address the internal control gaps identified by the Audit Readiness Assessment.
For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009 (the period under audit), the OCAE concludes with a high level of assurance that with a few exceptions, internal control activities over financial reporting at the entity level and for the five business processes (revenues, payroll expenditures, other operating expenditures, capital assets, and financial closing and reporting) existed and were generally operating effectively. Where they were not, deficiencies were related primarily to a lack of documentation, a lack of review and approval, and inadequate segregation of duties.
The Canada School should be ready to sustain an efficient controls-reliant audit of its financial statements by an external auditor if the organization:
- implements an action plan to remedy the exceptions noted above;
- audits the design and effectiveness of the internal control activities surrounding the transfer to the financial accounting system's new SAP platform (in operation since April 1, 2009); and
- audits the internal control activities over the compensation and benefits services operations (transferred to the Canada School in June 2009).
The organization should also be in a position to comply with the Treasury Board's new Policy on Internal Control (effective April 1, 2009), which will require, for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2012, the President and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Canada School to sign the modified and revised annual Statement of Management Responsibility Including Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
3.0 Introduction
The Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting is an assurance engagement that was part of the approved Canada School of Public Service Multi-year Risk Based Audit Plan 2008–2009 to 2010–2011. The OCAE of the Canada School conducted the audit engagement.
3.1 Background
In 2007, the Canada School's management elected to undergo a Financial Statements Audit Readiness Assessment. This decision went beyond the government's expectations of an organization of the size of the Canada School. The two main goals of this assessment were to strengthen the Canada School's internal control over financial reporting and to position the organization to undergo a controls-reliant audit of its financial statements by an external auditor. An external consulting firm carried out the initial three phases of the Audit Readiness Assessment, which included the following activities:
- review of the Canada School's financial statements and elements supporting them to ensure compliance with accounting policies and standards (Phase 1);
- documentation and assessment of the design of the internal control activities over financial reporting, at the entity level, and for the five business processes (revenues, payroll expenditures, other operating expenditures, capital assets; and financial closing and reporting) and General Computer Controls (GCC) (Phase 2); and
- audit of the Canada School's Statement of Financial Position as of March 31, 2008 (Phase 3) and issuance of an unqualified opinion.
This Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting is, in fact, a continuation of the Audit Readiness Assessment.
Finally, a recent event relating to the internal control over financial reporting is the new Treasury Board's Policy on Internal Control (effective April 1, 2009). This policy will require, for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2012, the President and the CFO of the Canada School to sign a modified annual Statement of Management Responsibility, re-titled Statement of Management Responsibility Including Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. The new Statement will continue to preface the Canada School's financial statements, and will include the following:
- acknowledgement of management's responsibility for ensuring that an effective system of internal controls is maintained over financial reporting;
- acknowledgement of the conduct of an annual assessment of the effectiveness of the system of internal controls;
- acknowledgement of the establishment of an action plan; and
- a summary of the results of the assessment and the actions taken in response to issues.
3.2 Audit Objective and Scope
The objective of the audit was to provide assurance that internal control activities over financial reporting existed and that they were operating effectively as intended.
The scope of the audit consisted of testing the existence and the operational effectiveness of the internal control activities over financial reporting identified and documented in Phase 2 of the Audit Readiness Assessment. These activities consisted of entity level controls and controls over the following five business processes:
- revenues
- payroll expenditures
- other operating expenditures
- capital assets
- financial closing and reporting
The audit covered the internal control activities whose design had been judged effective through the walkthroughs conducted during Phase 2 of the Audit Readiness Assessment. It also covered those internal control activities with deficiencies that management had since addressed. The testing period covered the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009. As well, where management had dealt with control deficiencies, audit coverage started at the point where corrective actions began. The examination phase of the audit was conducted between February and August 2009.
The audit did not examine or test the GCC and the internal controls relating to the financial accounting system's SAP platform, since the Canada School had planned to transfer its SAP software platform and service provider from the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat to the Department of Health Canada as of April 1, 2009. It was therefore decided that the GCC and the internal controls relating to the new SAP platform would not be included in the scope of this audit. The audit of GCC is planned for 2010-2011. Finally, the audit did not examine or test controls relating to compensation and benefits services, which were transferred from Public Works and Government Canada (PWGSC) to the Canada School in June 2009.
3.3 Audit Criteria
The audit sought to verify that internal control activities over financial reporting (as documented and assessed in Phase 2 of the Audit Readiness Assessment) exist and are operating as intended.
3.4 Approach and Methodology
The audit approach and methodology followed the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing as defined by the Institute of Internal Auditors and the Internal Auditing Standards for the Government of Canada as required under the Treasury Board's Policy on Internal Audit. These standards require that the audit be planned and performed in such a way as to obtain reasonable assurance that the audit objective is achieved. The audit was conducted in accordance with detailed audit programs that tested each of the internal control activities for each of the five business processes and at the entity level in operation during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009.
The audit approach included, but was not limited to, the following steps:
- reviewing the documentation prepared by the external consulting firm that worked on the initial three phases of the Audit Readiness Assessment and the action plan developed by Canada School management in response to the internal control gaps identified;
- performing detailed audit tests on the internal control activities to assess their operational effectiveness at the entity level and for each of the five business processes:
- revenues
- payroll expenditures
- other operating expenditures
- capital assets
- financial closing and reporting
- examining the following documents:
- 40 Memoranda of Understanding for courses and their related 121 invoices (revenues business process);
- 25 individual course invoices generated and managed by the Learner Registration Management (LRM) system (revenues business process);
- 67 individual pay action forms (payroll expenditures business process);
- 25 individual invoices (other operating expenditures business process); and
- individual invoices or journal vouchers (capital assets business process);
- performing detailed audit tests on three monthly internal control activities, such as reconciliations, and on all of the annual internal control activities applicable to each of the business processes.
4.0 Findings and Recommendations
4.1 Follow-up on the Action Plan of the Audit Readiness Assessment
OCAE found that the Canada School had developed an action plan to address the weaknesses identified in phase 2 of the Audit Readiness Assessment, and that the organization had generally made good progress in dealing with the gaps in internal control. However, OCAE found that the documentation describing new procedures - i.e. corrective action to address the internal control weaknesses - had not been updated. Unless any new procedures are clearly documented, there will be a risk that staff will carry out incorrect and out-of-date processes.
Recommendation #1:
OCAE recommends that the CFO develop an action plan to update the documentation of business processes to reflect the changes to the internal control activities resulting from the action plan following the Audit Readiness Assessment. (High Priority)
4.2 Management Variance Reporting Process
The Management Variance Reporting (MVR) process is a critical, overarching internal control activity. It plays a key oversight role and affects the business processes for the Canada School's revenues, payroll, and other operating expenditures. This audit raised a number of issues with respect to the MVR process. Collectively, these issues affect, among other things, the accuracy and timeliness of variance reporting.
At the time of the audit, OCAE noted that the Corporate Services branch was developing a new tool which will automate the reporting of the MVR process. This new tool is planned to be implemented in the next round of reporting (Fall 2009). If the Canada School builds rigor into the improved MVR process, this will be an important step towards both strengthening the organization's internal control and complying with the Treasury Board's Policy on Internal Control.
Recommendation #2:
OCAE recommends that the CFO continue to develop and implem
4.3 Lack of Documentation
For some of the internal control activities tested, supporting documentation was not available. For example, documentation was lacking for the reconciliation of financial data of two key systems - the LRM system and the Salary Management System (SMS) - to the financial accounting system SAP.
For example, the LRM system is a registry of students enrolled in various courses. It generates data on courses attended by students, which is necessary to prepare the invoices to bill departments for training. These invoices represent the Canada School's revenues. SAP, the organization's financial accounting system, is used to prepare annual financial statements. Accordingly, the financial data in the two systems must be reconciled in order to confirm that all the courses attended have been invoiced and related revenues accounted for.
OCAE found that the process for reconciling the data of the LRM system and the SAP system had not been documented, even though it is a common internal control activity. If documentation is missing there can be no reasonable assurance that staff have reconciled the data between the two systems, that all departments have been billed for all of the courses attended by their employees, and consequently that all the Canada School's revenues are accounted for in its financial statements.
Recommendation #3:OCAE recommends that the CFO, in collaboration with the Registrar, take the
following corrective actions:
- document detailed working procedures on key internal control activities easily accessible to all staff in an organized and complete document or manual type;
- develop standardized tools/aids to be used by staff and management in order for them to produce appropriate evidence of the internal control activity performed; and
- provide training to all implicated staff (High Priority)
4.4 Lack of Review and Approval and Inadequate Segregation of Duties
Review and approval processes and segregation of duties are, in effect, internal control activities and are part of the larger internal control framework.
Review and approval. For internal control to work effectively, organizations must have a process for certain staff to review and approve the work of others. The purpose of this process is to prevent and detect errors and inconsistencies and to reduce the risk of fraud. If review and approval processes are deficient, the effectiveness of other internal control activities is compromised, and risk increases.
In examining the internal control activities across the five business processes, OCAE found instances of inadequate review and approval procedures. Some were more critical for internal control purposes than others; the lack of review and approval over changes to the master files of vendors and customers in SAP is an example of a more critical inadequacy.
Segregation of duties. This internal control is designed to reduce the risks that may arise if employees perform incompatible tasks. An example of incompatible tasks is an employee both entering journal entries into a financial system and approving the transaction. OCAE found several instances of employees performing incompatible tasks, which creates the risk that a wide range of errors - such as incomplete or improperly recorded or presented transactions - could occur. All of these errors could ultimately affect the financial statements.
Recommendation #4:
OCAE recommends that the CFO establish procedures, including appropriate monitoring, to ensure that master files are subject to periodic review and approval and that accounting staff do not perform incompatible tasks. (High Priority)
4.5 Course Fees
An approved framework for setting fees is an accepted, common business practice for organizations that charge fees for providing a service. At the time of the audit, no official fee schedule or framework approved by senior management existed at the Canada School. As a result, there was an increased risk that the Canada School had charged some clients more than others for the same or equivalent courses. OCAE also noted in some instances that documentation to support any differences in fees charged (e.g., a discount for a large number of students) or to support a decision to cancel a course was not available.
OCAE noted, however, that the Canada School has since addressed this issue in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010. In fact, the Board of Governors endorsed a Pricing Framework and a discounting approach. As well, the Management Committee and the Sub-Committee to Management Committee sanctioned a Policy on Memorandum of Understanding and related documents.
5.0 Other Related Observations and Recommendations
5.1 Overall Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Several automated internal control activities in the financial accounting system SAP relate to the Canada School's five business processes. These have not yet been documented to reflect the change to the financial accounting system's new SAP platform service provider as of April 1, 2009.
Similarly, OCAE also noted that the internal control activities for the payroll expenditures business process have not been updated to reflect the June 2009 transfer of the compensation and benefits services from PWGSC to the Canada School.
Without complete documentation of both the key automated and manual internal control activities and the steps taken to deal with existing internal control gaps, it is not possible to fully assess the effectiveness of internal controls. Moreover, without complete documentation on these new systems and processes, there might be new weaknesses in the design and the effectiveness of internal control activities. There is therefore an increased risk that Canada School management may make inappropriate decisions based on an inaccurate picture of the effectiveness of the internal control framework.
As noted earlier, GCC were not part of the scope of this audit. GCC have an encompassing and overall effect on any organization's internal control related to its computerized systems. In the case of the Canada School, the financial accounting system SAP, the LRM system [which will be replaced by the new Integrated Learning Management System (I-LMS)] and the SMS are all computerized systems that are directly linked to the overall internal control over financial reporting. Canada School management should be aware that until the operational effectiveness of the organization's GCC has been tested, there is a risk that the Canada School will not be ready for a controls-reliant audit of its financial statements.
Recommendation #5:OCAE recommends that the CFO develop an action plan to:
- update the documentation of business processes to reflect the change to the new SAP platform service provider, as well as any other new or revised internal control activities implemented after April 1, 2009; and
- test the operating effectiveness of any new or updated internal control activities once they have been documented and implemented. (High Priority)
Recommendation #6:
OCAE recommends that the CFO, in collaboration with the Director General of Human Resources, develop an action plan to:
- update the documentation of business processes to reflect the transfer of compensation and benefits services from PWGSC to the Canada School; and
- test the operating effectiveness of the related internal control activities once they have been documented and implemented. (High Priority)
5.2 Learner Registration Management System
OCAE noted that the Canada School is currently developing the new I-LMS to replace the current LRM system, which has been in use for some time. This audit and phase 2 of the Audit Readiness Assessment, however, identified internal control weaknesses in the operations surrounding the LRM system, such as inadequate segregation of duties and lack of review of the individuals having access to it.
Call centre agents are responsible for inputting information on course participants into the LRM system. They can also change course pricing and update the participant's attendance status. They are also capable, however, of updating the LRM system "status" used for approving cancellations and adjustments. These are incompatible tasks.
OCAE noted that there is no process to periodically review the list of individuals with active user access to the LRM system. The list of individuals with access to the LRM system obtained by OCAE contained over 700 names. OCAE judges this number of individuals having access to the LRM system as being excessive, considering that the Canada School's 2008-2009 Report on Plans and Priorities reported a planned total of 940 Full-time Equivalent employees for the entire organization.
Recommendation #7:
OCAE recommends that the Registrar ensure that:
- internal control functionalities are incorporated in the new I-LMS in order that an appropriate segregation of duties for individuals having access to the system be respected; and
- procedures be developed and implemented in order to review, on a periodic basis, the users' access rights to the I-LMS in the production environment. (High Priority)
6.0 Overall Conclusion
Phase 2 of the Audit Readiness Assessment found some weaknesses in the design of the internal control activities that were examined. This audit found that, during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009, the Canada School made good progress in implementing the action plan that was developed to address the internal control gaps identified by the Audit Readiness Assessment.
For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009 (the period under audit), the OCAE concludes with a high level of assurance that, with a few exceptions, internal control activities over financial reporting at the entity level and for the five business processes (revenues, payroll expenditures, other operating expenditures, capital assets, and financial closing and reporting) existed and were generally operating effectively. Where they were not, deficiencies were related primarily to a lack of documentation, a lack of review and approval and inadequate segregation of duties.
The Canada School should be ready to sustain an efficient controls-reliant audit of its financial statements by an external auditor if the organization:
- implements an action plan to remedy the exceptions noted above;
- audits the operational effectiveness of the design and effectiveness of the internal control activities surrounding the transfer to the financial accounting system's new SAP platform (in operation since April 1, 2009); and
- audits the internal control activities over the compensation and benefits services operations (transferred to the Canada School in June 2009).
The organization should also be in a position to comply with the Treasury Board's new Policy on Internal Control (effective April 1, 2009), which will require, for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2012, the President and the CFO of the Canada School to sign the modified and revised annual Statement of Management Responsibility Including Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
James Meddings
Acting President and Chief Executive Officer
Canada School of Public Service
Appendix A - Recommendations, Management Response and Action Plan
Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting (as of 4 December 2009)
Appendix A - Recommendations, Management Response and Action Plan. Read down the first column to the reference that interests you. Read across to the right for the recommendations, management response, actions planned, responsible managers, deliverables and planned implementation dates.
Audit Report Ref. |
Recommendations |
Management Response (Accept / Reject) |
Actions Planned |
Responsible Managers |
Deliverables |
Planned Implementation Dates |
4.1 Follow-up on the Action Plan of the Audit Readiness Assessment |
1) High Priority |
OCAE recommends that the CFO develop an action plan to update the documentation of business processes to reflect the changes to the internal control activities resulting from the action plan following the Audit Readiness Assessment. |
Accept |
1.1 Documentation for many of the business processes has already been updated as a result of the action plan following the Audit Readiness Assessment. For example, the changes to the internal control activities in the financial closing and reporting business processes in Corporate Reporting were updated in summer 2009.
A prioritized, risk-based approach will be established to review and update the outstanding internal control activities for each of the business processes as required. |
Director Comptrollership and Quality Assurance Michelle Gleeson |
1.1.1 Prioritized listing of business processes to be updated with planned dates for their completion.
1.1.2 Approved and updated business processes to be placed on the Canada School's Intranet. |
1.1.1 End of December 2009.
1.1.2 March 2010. |
4.2 Management Variance Reporting Process |
2) High Priority |
OCAE recommends that the CFO continue to develop and implement the improved Management Variance Reporting (MVR) process and supporting tools and models and that the CFO considers incorporating quality assurance procedures. |
Accept |
2.1 The financial accounting system's new SAP platform, in use since April 1, 2009, includes access to an automated MVR forecasting tool via a web-based Management Reporting System application. In October 2009, the automated MVR forecasting tool was launched on a pilot basis. It is currently in production at the Canada School and is receiving its final quality assurance testing by Resource Management. Corporate Services delivered training to all branches and regions of the Canada School.
This new automated MVR forecasting tool now permits the on-line preparation of forecasts. The data on the budgeted, actual or spent, and committed amounts under payroll expenditures, other operating expenditures, revenues and capital assets are downloaded directly from the financial accounting system SAP. A reconciliation between the financial data as accounted in the General Ledger maintained in the SAP and the MVR financial information is completed prior to opening access to the system. This ensures the quality of the information.
The MVR automated tool also gives users
access to detailed reports of the
expenditures and commitments that are
totalled in the pre-populated MVR reports,
which will allow easier analysis and ensures
integrity of the data. |
Director Resource Management and Analysis
Doug Hazel |
2.1.1 Automated MVR tool to be fully implemented. |
2.1.1 November 2009 |
4.3 Lack of Documentation |
3) High Priority |
OCAE recommends that the CFO, in collaboration with the Registrar, take the following corrective actions:
- document detailed working procedures on key internal control activities easily accessible to all staff in an organized and complete document or manual type;
- develop standardized tools/aids to be used by staff and management in order for them to produce appropriate evidence of the internal control activity performed; and
- provide training to all implicated staff.
|
Accept |
3.1 The key controls are being allocated by job functions where applicable and are to be included in the desk procedures and in goals and objectives of staff in the affected positions. The sequence of desk procedures is based on the risk, type and frequency of activity (e.g. approval of payment run; acquisition card). |
Director Financial Policy and Operations
Tommy Pham |
3.1.1 Key Controls to be imbedded in Goals and objectives.
3.1.2 Documented matrix of Key Controls/Job Functions to be created.
3.1.3 Desk procedures to be documented with clear references to Internal Controls by function.
3.1.4 Document reconciliation process between LRM and SAP to be implemented. |
3.1.1 April 1, 2010.
3.1.2 December 2009.
3.1.3 Ongoing basis.
3.1.4 Completed. |
3.2 Various stamps currently exist (e.g. "checked" stamp; stamp for verifying Sections 32, 33, and 34). A review will be conducted to determine if these existing stamps can be used to remedy certain inefficiencies, or if new stamps are required. A review will be conducted to determine what additional tools or aids are required for monitoring, control and reconciliation. |
Director Financial Policy and Operations
Tommy Pham |
3.2.1 Changes or tools required as determined by the review to be reviewed and implemented. |
3.2.1 March 31, 2010. |
3.3 Workshop sessions to be delivered on Internal Controls for the FI community and Accounting clerks. |
Director Financial Policy and Operations
Tommy Pham |
3.3.1 Workshop sessions to be delivered on Internal Controls to the FI community and Accounting clerks. |
3.3.1 Both workshops sessions were delivered in September 2009. |
4.4 Lack of Review and Approval and Inadequate Segregation of Duties |
4) High Priority |
OCAE recommends that the CFO establish procedures, including appropriate monitoring, to ensure that master files are subject to periodic review and approval and that accounting staff do not perform incompatible tasks. |
Accept |
4.1 A process will be documented and implemented regarding creation of and changes to master files for vendors and customers. This process will include the review, verification and approval of changes to master files. |
Director Financial Policy and Operations
Tommy Pham |
4.1.1 Business processes for the master files to be reviewed and revised as required to include when an annual review will be done. It will also include the process involving segregation of duties of reviewing, verifying and approving changes to master files. |
4.1.1 December 2009 |
5.1 Overall Effectiveness of the Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
5) High Priority |
OCAE recommends that the CFO develop an action plan to:
- update the documentation of business processes to reflect the change to the new SAP platform service provider, as well as any other new or revised internal control activities implemented after April 1, 2009; and
- test the operating effectiveness of any new or updated internal control activities once they have been documented and implemented.
|
Accept |
5.1 A prioritized, risk-based approach will be established to review and update the documentation of business processes as required to reflect the change to the new SAP platform and any other new or revised internal control activities implemented after April 1, 2009 and to test operating effectiveness. |
Director Comptrollership and Quality Assurance Michelle Gleeson |
5.1.1 Prioritized listing of processes to be updated.
5.1.2 Approved updated business processes to be placed on the Canada School's Intranet.
5.1.3 Results and action plans to be tested for any identified gaps. |
5.1.1 December 2009.
5.1.2 March 2010.
5.1.3 End of 1st quarter 2010- 2011. |
6) High Priority |
OCAE recommends that the CFO, in collaboration with the Director General of Human Resources, develop an action plan to
- update the documentation of business processes to reflect the transfer of the compensation and benefits services from Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) to the Canada School; and
- test the operating effectiveness of the related internal control activities once they have been documented and implemented.
|
Accept |
6.1 Work in collaboration with the Corporate Services branch to identify the key controls related to the Pay and Compensation business processes and document; review and update the processes beginning with the riskier processes as the highest priority. |
Director Labour Management Relations
Marc Leclaire
Manager Human Resources Operations Linda Bizai
Director Comptrollership and Quality Assurance Michelle Gleeson |
6.1.1 Key Pay and Compensation control objectives and control activities to be listed.
6.1.2 Documented business processes are to be in line with PWGSC's Compensation requirements. |
6.1.1 End January 2010.
6.1.2 End of March 2010. |
6.2 Compensation processes to be integrated in the Staffing processes where applicable. |
Director Labour Management Relations
Marc Leclaire
Manager Human Resources Operations Linda Bizai |
6.2.1 Compensation processes to be integrated in the Staffing processes. |
6.2.1 End of April 2010. |
6.3 Development of Compensation Service Standards |
Manager Human Resources Operations Linda Bizai
Director Human Resources Advisory and Operational Services Division Louise Samuel |
6.3.1 Compensation Service Standards to be developed. |
6.3.1 End of April 2010. |
6.4 Develop a strategy/plan and test the operating effectiveness of the process controls. |
Director Labour Management Relations
Marc Leclaire
Manager Human Resources Operations Linda Bizai
Director Comptrollership and Quality Assurance Michelle Gleeson |
6.4.1 Results and action plans to be tested for any identified gaps. |
6.4.1 End of 1st quarter 2010- 2011. |
5.2 Learner Registration Management System |
7) High Priority |
OCAE recommends that the Registrar ensure that
- internal control functionalities are incorporated in the new Integrated Learning Management System (I-LMS) in order that an appropriate segregation of duties for individuals having access to the system be respected; and
- procedures be developed and implemented in order to review, on a periodic basis, the users' access rights to the I-LMS in the production environment.
|
Accept |
7.1 The I-LMS acquired by the Canada School is a "roles-based" application. Access to the system and data and user rights are associated with users' identified roles.
Work is currently well underway via the I-LMS governance to identify roles and proposed access to the system as well as data and users' rights associated with those roles. The approval of the I-LMS Integration Committee will be required before the I-LMS goes live. |
Director General Registration and Reporting
Steven McLaughlin
Director Integrated Learning Management System
James Oickle |
7.1.1 Roles and proposed access to the system data to be identified, as well as user rights for each role.
7.1.2 Final Integration Committee approval to be obtained. |
7.1.1 April 2010, coincident with I-LMS go-live.
7.1.2 by March 15, 2010. |
7.2 The Registrar will implement an annual process to review user access rights in the I-LMS environment. An administrative process will also be put in place to continually capture changes in individuals' roles arising from changing positions or departure from the Canada School and other organizations. |
Director General Registration and Reporting
Steven McLaughlin
Director Integrated Learning Management System
James Oickle |
7.2.1 An annual process to be established to review I-LMS roles and access rights.
7.2.2 Administrative procedures to be established to capture changes in individuals' roles. |
7.2.1 Annual process agreed to by I-LMS Integration Committee by April 2010. First annual review by April 2011.
7.2.2 Administrative procedures established and implemented by April 2010, coincident with I‑LMS going "live". |
Appendix B - Acronyms
Canada School:
Canada School of Public Service
CFO:
Chief Financial Official
GCC:
General Computer Controls
I-LMS:
Integrated Learning Management System
LRM system:
Learner Registration Management system
MVR:
MVR
Management Variance Reporting
OCAE:
Office of the Chief Audit Executive
PWGSC:
Public Works and Government Services
Canada
SMS:
Salary Management System
- Date modified: